The fan factor and the technological means
23:11:09 · Financial Analysis · 930 Readers · 6 Comments
Are unquestionable financial resources and capacity available to the FIFA and UEFA for the organization, management and administration of world football. Although the speech of the organizers is directed to the fan (eg Platini before his election), the method used for the management and administration of the various competitions, has left the interests of fans and the truth of the game out of its priorities.
One of the biggest factors for success in sports and financial Premier League and almost all North American professional sports, involving the organization, management and administration of the various modality based on respect for the fans. Both the leaders of the EPL in England, like the NBA, NHL, MLB, MLS , the United States know that the three most important factors to involve fans in the sports industry are: (1) a competitive tournament, (2) worship Player, (3) truth and fairness of sport results.
Of the three factors outlined above, truth and justice of sporting results is one that most fans away from the game and the point where more FIFA and UEFA have failed in their relationship with who feeds the whole football industry. There are numerous possibilities that current technology allows us to offer the game. This is our choice and solution as a means of returning to the true sports fan and fair outcomes.
Arbitration and technological means
- The viewing of the repetition of a move by an arbitrator bench, takes no more than a few seconds, and communication via headset with the field umpire immediately.
- Like in rugby, each team captain may request the viewing of only three throws per game.
- It saves the time that players lose their arguing with the referee after a questionable move, with the usual disciplinary action that condition later players and teams.
- In case of doubt the referee bench, remains the decision of the arbitrator in the field.
- By clear structural deficiencies, the lower divisions would continue with the current system.
- It is estimated that the reduction of serious errors of arbitration would be in the order of 90%.
There are countless business of selling rights to various competitions by FIFA and UEFA. These deals are only possible because there are millions of fans in football, but has yet to make the biggest deal ever, the contract with the fans. This contract, to be held and although it does not involve financial compensation, may increase over again throughout the football industry. Why are not implemented these or other solutions to restore the truth of the game? Tell us what you think through your comment.
Comments
6 Comments on "The fan factor and the technological means"Comments
* Comments are moderated by the site administrator. Once approved the comment, it will be published in their article. Football Finance reserves the right to delete your comment, if this is off topic, or otherwise offensive.
I think the big problem is the conservatism that "reigns" in both the fifa and uefa. we all know who rules the football world are Europeans and we know how they are too cautious to undertake changes that permit the new technology "influence" the games at the expense of control exercised by them backstage. it is one that you retargua European masters of the world will not want the ball without losing the "war". remember the last world in which the controversial moves left to be repeated!
I fully agree with the article, you need to think about the football fan first because besides being a sport is also a show that has fans and people Willing to pay to see this sporting spectacle.
I think the only reason that leads to the UEFA and FIFA regulations do not change is due to pressure from sponsors because the sponsors always want teams with gains in the advanced stages of competitions and easiest way to make that happen is to continue own little with these regulations in order to put pressure on arbitrators to commit biased refereeing.
PS: Just one fix, in UEFA competitions the players' shirts have "RESPECT" and my question is by whom?
the fan is not sure, but also the fan is only the most important factor.
The big problem is the same that makes football the sport's most well-liked in the world.
The rules are the same for any level of competition. The NBA Basketball diverges when and where it is FIBA. Rugby while growth is a phenomenon but does not compete with football.
Ultimately, however technological development can not be ignored. The big question is who take the vagueness of football, the sport become a mechanic, like a game of video games, the impediments are never wrong and so on.
Sign underneath this article. Football should use technology in their favor, and that involves all those involved directly or indirectly from the spectacle of the game.
The federations can not just leave with the TV show the function of the bids in more detail, the replays and different angles of a move. For those watching from home, technological resources are well used, but eventually it's pointless to change the outcome of the game something more fair and serious.
But for fans who are in stages, and especially the judges and assistants, one should rather explore all the resources that TV provides. This would not only justice in the results, since the judges are prone to mistakes, and with the help of replays and technological resources, can change their decisions in seconds, not interfering in the outcome of the game, nor in the segment of the game.
In addition, the championships will be much appreciated by all, whether members of a club would be harmed but with the use of these resources will not be more, be with the fans, who surely understand that this is for the good of football, either with the companies sponsoring the event, which will not have affected his image, as sometimes happens in a championship decided because of an error of judge.
In recent weeks, two examples called attention:
France qualified for the World Cup in 2010 with a goal that began in a totally illegal, and caught by the cameras, where Henry dominates and straightens the ball in hand and crosses into the goal. We're talking about a playoff spot for the biggest event in club football, and that hurt too much to Ireland. If the judge had reviewed the bid, I'm sure back down, and the game could have another advert for the World Cup.
In the Brazilian Championship, there is even a club that thinks that was not harmed. In each round a team leaves disagree - often rightly - with the errors of judges, which directly influence the outcome of games.
The Palms, for example, complained much of the match against Fluminense at Maracana, which lost 1-0. When the game was still 0-0 in the Sao Paulo team had a goal nullified Obina badly, marked lack of it, it did absolutely nothing irregular in the play. Palmeiras is in the race, and was distraught.
So who's going to blame? Pro judge, of course! Obvious that if a bid very clear that the judge is wrong, this should be punished. But the main do not, that is to use technology to get back in the marking of the judge.
And in bid more difficult, this was true. In tennis, for example, is sometimes impossible to know exactly where the ball was in or outside the court, and the player may request revision to the judge. In many cases there really are bugs, yes and the judge can go back.
This should be followed in all sports. Volleyball also has many controversies, as ringtones on blocking balls in the line, two rings, and so on, and it costs nothing to use these image resources.
Football, and sport as a whole, needs to be taken seriously, and nothing more than just take the technology not only for broadcasts but for the fans in the stadiums can see replays, and the judge have the chance to go back on Bids difficult or easy.
No more thoughts of outdated technology that destroys the essence of football, because it is not so. Football is business today, and involves multiple players. You can not do everything right in the vicinity of a game, and forget the general principal that all this commotion around the global football: the game.
Entities to modernize, to open their minds and do the best for the modern game.
"This is our choice and solution as a means of returning to the true sports fan and fair outcomes." In return, it is understood that truth and justice in football already existed in the past and I know it was not common use of all the technologies so famous. The problem, in my view, is not to stop the errors but to change minds. Knowing you, even unfairly, is a virtue, and forgive mistakes too. Of course there is purposeful but these mistakes should be corrected by the contracting out of bounds (should be) competent and heavy punishments.
Attention, I'm not against the use of new technologies in football, there are several with which I agree as sensors in the lines and the ball, but with regard to stopping the game to see if it was missing or not honestly think I would take any joke to the game and make it more boring. What bothers me most when I watch NBA or American Football are just all these stops in the pace of the game that makes it annoying and makes me change channels.
Sooner or later will be the future of professional football, by viewing the video does not "hawk eye" - expensive to implement but with strong lobby for a minimum probability applicable to tennis there are thousands of questionable move by inches - football is the game of outlaws, and dangerous faults or faults simulations on the players especially in large area.
I hate when my team won with the absence of truth, but I hate the penalty area in the derbies of Benfica or Sporting Lisbon with Porto, is always a shortage directly on large area or a penalty or expulsion is warranted is a "luxho" ...
In the end everyone should be compensated, it is true, but I preferred compensation in the exact minute, we shall see who will defend and who will oppose these changes to the game.