Deloitte Football Money League 2010
03:03:10 · Studies and Rankings 5752 · Readers · 27 Comments
The 13th edition of the Deloitte Football Money League, welcomes the 5th consecutive year as the Real Madrid club that generates more revenue worldwide. The amount of revenue the club in Madrid, referring to the 2008/2009 season is also a new record, surpassing the barrier of 400 million Euros. The total revenue of the top 20 clubs in the world, in the report produced by the Sports Business Group at Deloitte, reach 3,900 million Euros, an increase of 26 million euros compared to last year's report.
Most clubs remain in the list, highlighting the rise fo FC Barcelona to second place thanks to the excellent performance of his team on the field, culminating in winning the Champions League. However the fall of the pound against the Euro, which between 2007 and 2009 lost 21% against the common currency, still does not favor the English clubs.
Deloitte Football Money League 2010
| Pos | Club | Ticket | TV Rights | Trade | Total Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Real Madrid | 101.4 M € | 160.8 M € | 139.2 M € | 401.4 M € |
| 2. | FC Barcelona | 95.5 M € | 158.4 M € | 112.0 M € | 365.9 M € |
| 3. | Manchester United | 127.7 M € | 117.1 M € | 82.2 M € | 327.0 M € |
| 4. | Bayern Munich | 60.6 M € | 69.6 M € | 159.3 M € | 289.5 M € |
| 5. | Armory | 117.5 M € | 89.0 M € | 56.5 M € | 263.0 M € |
| 6. | Chelsea | 87.4 M € | 92.9 M € | 62.0 M € | 242.3 M € |
| 7. | Liverpool | 49.9 M € | 87.6 M € | 79.5 M € | 217.0 M € |
| 8. | Juventus | 16.7 M € | 132.2 M € | 54.3 M € | 203.2 M € |
| 9. | Internazionale | 28.2 M € | 115.7 M € | 52.6 M € | 196.5 M € |
| 10. | AC Milan | 33.4 M € | 99.0 M € | 54.6 M € | 196.5 M € |
| 11. | Hamburger SV | 55.5 M € | 35.6 M € | 55.6 M € | 147.6 M € |
| 12. | AS Roma | 18.8 M € | 86.9 M € | 40.7 M € | 146.4 M € |
| 13. | Olympique Lyon | 22.4 M € | 68.1 M € | 49.1 M € | 139.6 M € |
| 14. | Olympique Marseille | 24.9 M € | 65.6 M € | 42.7 M € | 133.2 M € |
| 15. | Tottenham Hotspur | 46.3 M € | 52.6 M € | 33.8 M € | 132.7 M € |
| 16. | Schalke 04 | 29.2 M € | 34.2 M € | 61.1 M € | 124.5 M € |
| 17. | Werder Bremen | 27.8 M € | 61.2 M € | 25.7 M € | 114.7 M € |
| 18. | Borussia Dortmund | 22.2 M € | 22.4 M € | 58.9 M € | 103.5 M € |
| 19. | Manchester City | 24.4 M € | 56.7 M € | 21.1 M € | 102.2 M € |
| 20. | Newcastle United | 34.1 M € | 44.1 M € | 22.8 M € | 101.0 M € |
(Amounts in € million)
These are the clubs that were outside the rankings, for Fenerbahce, as the only team in this 30 / 1 that is not part of one of the five major European leagues.
21. Paris Saint-Germain - 100.8 million Euros
22. Atletico Madrid - 100.3 million Euros
23. Girondins Bordeaux - 99.8 million Euros
24. VfB Stuttgart - 99.8 million Euros
25. Aston Villa - 98.9 million Euros
26. ACF Fiorentina - 94.1 million Euros
27. Everton - 93.5 million Euros
28. SSC Napoli - 90.1 million Euros
29. West Ham United - 89.3 million Euros
30. Fenerbahce SK - 87.0 million Euros
Of the 30 clubs reported in the study, only six nations are represented, England: 10 clubs, Italy: 6 Clubs, Germany: 6 Clubs, France: four clubs, Spain: three clubs, Turkey: a club.
NOTES: Revenue excluding player transfers and taxes. Non-football activities and capital transactions have also been excluded from revenues and accounting for business reasons, due to different ways of recording the same transaction.
Comments
27 Comments on "Deloitte Football Money League 2010Trackbacks
Learn what others are saying this article ...-
[...] Futebol Finance Matéria completa, clique aqui. [...]
Comments
* Comments are moderated by the site administrator. Once approved the comment, it will be published in their article. Football Finance reserves the right to delete your comment, if this is off topic, or otherwise offensive.
if not for the tv Italian teams would be in a situation far worse, the stadiums are the flies
and think that this recipe is the real madrid last season, I want to see emerge when the revenue from the season now
... but also what they spend're not in the comic book!
On this news, no references, that FC Porto is the richest club in Portugal, in this study and the only Portuguese club to be among the top 50 clubs, as was reported in More Football, so this news is not complete and the funniest, Benfica do not have so many recipes as they purport to Benfica many, possibly most of the members of benfica do not pay their dues, but it also happens with the Port and all Portuguese clubs. And that history of televisions that will solve all the problems of benfica are mistaken, because I've seen an economic newspaper recently that the range of sets of three large companies that pay their advertisements in these games by walking around € 500,000.00 600,000.00000 the euro, is Porto, Sporting, Benfica or so television in Portugal is not, nor will be, the chickens that laid the golden eggs wishing Benfica, nor for the nice nor none of the big three, it will be identical to any of them, just one researches for the net and will arrive in this study saw a financial newspaper. I think this crisis is for everyone and the dreams that miracles will happen, financial miracles, have no foundation, that will sell the best players to survive, as does the Port and how it has to do any Portuguese club if you want to survive, including the nice. Besides, the market for players, is in freefall and Benfica will feel it in the skin, alias as the offer from Chelsea by David Ludwig, is very enlightening, 11 million, know that the President of Benfica, has said wants to make 20 million euros for the player, but hardly going to make this value, since the market is low. The same applies to the SC Port or Portugal. Anyone thinking otherwise is not grounded and is not being rational and being led by your heart, I respect that, but none so blind as he who sees and does not want to see. Greetings to all sports fans of all clubs. I hope to publish this information if they are impartial and do not wear the jersey of a club, as often happens, if not publish, I never write here, because besides being a waste of time, shows a lack of impartiality, since derespeitei not anyone. Greetings sports.
Joan Smith also read this news, which comes against ever wrote here .. Benfica as always never reach the values that its supporters say, by the way here who had said repeatedly that Benfica generated 100M per year, but anyway ...
Pedro Mota, FC Porto is the richest and made 68 million, to appear in the first 50 clubs, it means that the nice had to make mandatory at least that what made the fc door, this is less than the 68 million euros, but the Portuguese market is small and is very difficult to do more than this value, unless it is winning the Champions League, but this only happens to the Portuguese club, from 20 to 20 years or more, so life is difficult for all Portuguese clubs, but more difficult for those who have larger debts, as the case of Porto, and Benfica SCPortugal, the larger and more difficult is the debt payment, this is in all activities, as in football not simply claim that it has assets of 355 million as debt disappears, then you may have assets and are active players, as it is now very difficult to market these assets are worth as much as they think they are worth because the market is stagnant and falling, so it'll be a problem for all so Portuguese clubs, all without exception, but more for those with larger liabilities, as the case of Benfica. Benfica hands of the shareholders what they want and the club for years to stay with the players they have and buy more than a Messi, Ronaldo or a Kaka for the price of 200 million, that there is no problem and they even think so is that the club was being managed well, PORQ
Pedro Mota, FC Porto is the richest and made 68 million, to appear in the first 50 clubs, it means that the nice had to make mandatory at least that what made the fc door, this is less than the 68 million euros, but the Portuguese market is small and is very difficult to do more than this value, unless it is winning the Champions League, but this only happens to the Portuguese club, from 20 to 20 years or more, so life is difficult for all Portuguese clubs, but more difficult for those who have larger debts, as the case of Porto, and Benfica SCPortugal, the larger and more difficult is the debt payment, this is in all activities, as in football not simply claim that it has assets of 355 million as debt disappears, then you may have assets and are active players, as it is now very difficult to market these assets are worth as much as they think they are worth because the market is stagnant and falling, so it'll be a problem for all so Portuguese clubs, all without exception, but more for those with larger liabilities, as the case of Benfica. Benfica hands of the shareholders what they want and the club for years to stay with the players they have and buy more than a Messi, Ronaldo or a Kaka for the price of 200 million, that there is no problem and they even think so is that the club was being managed well, because they had an asset of 650 million and a debt of 640 million, but had to pay the interest on debt and asset will be sold that gave this value?? doubt it, but would have to pay such interest to the banks and the club was bankrupt, although the assets, because the club was fragile and would have to sell cheaper than the market dictates, aware of the fragility of this club because he needed to sell, This was not the case with Manchester U. with Cristiano Ronaldo, since no such necessidada, but Benfica have this need and plenty. Greetings sports
Dear Joan Smith,
Facts:
Benfica have stayed in the TOP20 of the richest clubs in the world ... not the Port!
You compare a time when the Port is at Champions, where he received awards over € 20M TV railed and Benfica ... not!
When Benfica came to this list, Porto and Benfica were on equal footing since both participated in the Champions!
One more thing, even if not participating Benfica in the Champions, and doing a mediocre season ... had about € 80M in revenue!
We will see in coming years, with all renegotiations that Benfica will do, the level of sponsorship, which has begun to Sagres ... and will end in the other Sponsor ending one year contract here (Adidas and PT) ... I will speak to the naming of the stadium and the new TV contract!
PS: Review your sources, because it will not take a tremendous disappointment ... David Luiz Benfica does not leave for less than € 30M ... and yet ... and also tell you now, that Di Maria will leave for 40M €!
PS2: Peter Benfica generates around € 100M yes ... but not as involved in the Champions, and did a great season, this has affected the revenues of Benfica!
Mr. Kallos thereof, with all due respect to inform yourself better, but that the Deloitte study, the nice appears with 48.8 million euros, the same as the Sporting 48.6 million, goes very badly informed, could find a little of that study and then not have made this mistake if you please, is what the study says. Greetings sports, because if Benfica had made 80 million, would appear ahead of FC Porto in this study, since Porter played 68 MILLION EUROS AND THAT I KNOW ARE 80 MILLION MORE THAN 68 MILLION, SO DID MORE PORT 20 MILLIONS THAT THE BENFICA (A LIE DITA MAITE TIMES NOT PASS TO BE TRUE). GREETINGS SPORTS. is more strict in numbers.
Sr No Kalou and for the sale of players, remembers the case Simao Sabrosa, who did not sell the nice for less than EUR 25 million and the market was booming and was sold for 18 million euros. so it will not do even half of what he says with Di Maria and David Luiz. Greetings sports
Sr No Kalou, think a little bit, you have so many recipes, because it has a liability of 500 million euros, said the President of Benfica, a general meeting, to transfer the stage for the sad and has 350 million in consolidated liabilities?? If you make as much money as you say, competing with Milan and was in Receitoas each year in the 10 richest in the world, which is not the case, not even close and is nowhere near the level of revenue and if it will SCPortugal Champions League is at the level of FC Porto. Greetings sports
Benfica and Sporting Siamese but far from portistas
The other big national football had operating income nearly equal, but below those recorded for FC Porto. Benfica, as presented in the report and accounts 2008/09, received 46.88 million euros of revenues, which were larger slices from advertising and sponsorships (11.5 million) and revenue television (10 million). In Chelsea, the income was almost the same: 46.82. The plot was the same on television. Lions have raised, yet, another ten million for participation in European competitions and more also with the gate receipts and posts annual. In favor of the red is the value of the contribution: 8.2 million received Benfica and Sporting 4.4.
Still, overall, both Benfica and Sporting have reached 19.3 million euros less than the FC Porto.
And now I wonder if the futebolfinance is exempt or not, publishing this information or take advantage of one of the club and not publish this information, if the benfica, I understand that failure to publish, because the truth hurts. Greetings sports
1 the simão sold for 25 million ... 20 million in cash and five million on two players atl madrid.
2 di maria and david luiz being the most sought after players in the market and I do not admire them nothing if the transfers had record figures for the Portuguese league.
3 the values that the user kalle mentioned (those 80 million and the top20 richest clubs) are the 05/06 season I think, and then was Champions Benfica and had a frustrating time. Conclusion, Benfica even having a miserable season could generate much more revenue that the Port will be when both were champions, and it shows a huge difference in potential to generate revenues between the mark and the mark Benfica Porto (even going almost every year will champions is just a Top50).
Sr º Diogo Santos, with all due respect, but it seems not read, pay attention to the writings of Mr Kalou and I sitar:
"When he joined Benfica this list, Porto and Benfica were on equal footing since both participated in the Champions!
One more thing, even if not participating Benfica in the Champions, and doing a mediocre season ... had about € 80M in revenue!
he says that Benfica was like Porto in the Champions League when he joined the list, and then says the opposite, where we ????? who says he is not me.
And do not forget the nice was that many years to the Champions League and one year only reached this level because they reached the quarter finals, with barcelona, but this is not normal to the nice, so it will not dreaming lose nothing, this is the reality, like it or not.
With regard to Simao Sabrosa, I ask my excuse in that it was sold for 20 million and not 18 million but never came the two players, this was to fool Benfica Simao Sabrosa and marked on average 15 goals in the league was much better Di Maria the four goals that mark in the league for years. At the end of the year, we see reality or your dreams, if someone wants and how much are they willing to pay for it, which I doubt that is more than 18 million, which would be excellent for the nice. But we have time to see what is right and I think it'll be very wrong for the value of Di Maria. If you could see international matches, you would see that several players will be better than Di Maria and far cheaper than you want by Di Maria, much cheaper, why is your dream, but doing well on dreaming, because dreams command life but it's just a dream. Greetings sports
When you do not know what is best inform themselves!
The report of Deloitte refers only to SAD and their companies ... but when I mentioned the approximately 80M € revenue that Benfica does every year I'm referring to the recipes totals for all societies and club!
Benfica when he entered the TOP20 with 86.6 M € in revenue that year generated more ... ultrupassou the 100M € ... only that the recipes were the other club and not the DSS who's who of ^ 'in the rights of football!
Sr No Kalou then explain to me how the nice has a liability monstrous, more than 500 million euros, since now made a bond of 40 million, and a general meeting the President of Benfica said the liabilities the nice was 500 million. if he had so many gains as you say, how the club spent the past four years 250 million liability to the 520 million liability.
LOOK FOR WHEN THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN HELD BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN BENFICA 16/12/2009
BenficaAG approves financial restructuring, SAD technically bankrupt and leaves the group triggers liability to 500 million
The General Assembly approved the financial restructuring Benfica Group Sport Lisboa e Benfica by a large majority, with 2307 votes (83.6 percent), 171 abstentions (6.2 percent) and 283 votes (10.2 percent ).
The approval will allow the DSS Benfica out of technical bankruptcy in which it was, starting to have positive equity of 28 million instead of the 11.8 million that ended last year.
Under the proposal, those 28 million represent 25 percent of the share capital of SAD, which will increase from 75 to 115 million, ie an increase of 40 million.
The same plan is designed to strengthen the position of the club in SAD, directly and indirectly, from 51 percent to 68-40 percent of the club over 28 percent of Benfica SGPS - which will trigger the liability of the Group for 497 3 million euros.
The liability of SAD increase to 246.8 million, while the club is reduced by 84.2 million (162.2 million and was going to 78 million).
At the same time, the club ceases to 77.1 million euros due to SAD, the Benfica Stadium and the SGPS, becoming the lender of 5.1 million of SAD.
The board also received a "green light" from the assembly to effect a merger of Benfica Stadium with SAD, although this operation is dependent on "Project Finance".
At the end of major meeting, the President of the General Assembly of Benfica, Luís Nazaré, congratulated the management of the club "by the way put forward the proposal," so "that all the Benfica have understood that this was the way forward ".
On the implications of this restructuring approved today, Louis Nazareth said that "will focus on economic and financial situation of the group of Benfica and the economic position of the club in various companies that comprise."
For Louis Nazareth, this restructuring was "fundamental" because it introduces "more rational in the logic of the Group", allowing to solve some "permanent conditions such as Article 35 of the Code of commercial companies," which required "a resolution regarding the situation of the capital SAD. "
In this new context, the President of the General Assembly considered that Benfica has "an economic and financially capable, it solves a number of bottlenecks that were present and other events of default on that are completely outdated."
alone the news says it all, I know you do not want to see reality, but life is anyway. know why the club Benfica, transferred the stage for the sad? It was because we had so many profits that the club members decided to give a gift to the shareholders and run out of the stadium, or was it because the management has been ruinous and were forced to surrender the stage to Benfica Sad, do not close the doors and open bankruptcy, accepted because it was so ruinous administration of Sad which members were required, I reiterate, leaning against the wall and forced to save Sad benfica, this is the reality, like it or not. Greetings sports.
Mrs Kalou, how much is worth the players of Marseille and is a team average of europe, which demostraeam be better tactically and technically, dominating almost always the nice at all stages of the game, surely worth amis million than 50 million di Maria and 50 million from David Luiz or other players of Benfica. It will be worth 60 million each from the majority of Marseille players? Of course not. And since Marseille in Europe will most of the 15 teams at least average European level, which was eliminated from the Champions League, but they know we know all the players of Marseille are not worth the millions that think they are worth Benfica Di Maria and some players of Benfica. It's easy for any major European club to go buy these clubs and players average better than those of Benfica, and for much lower prices than those in benfica, think they will be paying millions for players of Benfica, one can get better and cheap, just put this reflection to think a bit, as was the nice and the level of the benfica game is easily controlled European average per team as Marseille, I know it's hard to accept the truth, but that's life. If he saw other European teams to play in Germany, the Netherlands, France, Spain, Russia, Turkey, would see what I say is true. Greetings sports
1 Benfica came from a very serious crisis and exacerbate spends about 25/30 million each year, and frankly admit that the best politics is n then the liability of 500m (recall that the largest institutions in the country as the edp and pt are those that teem greater liability but the liability of Benfica is too high). But the issue here was not that we were to compare the ability to generate revenue of branded and brand Porto Benfica on a par (both in the Champions) by mistake because I was not 80 million but 100 million (better yet
), Completion Benfica in equal circumstances with Porto is top20 (even doing a horrible time) is Porto European and Top50.
2 for comparison with the di maria and the simão n is the best because even though I find that Simon was more regular in seasons with Benfica was not age as di maria has not he held in the selection, so the di maria has potential to evolve and be one of the best in the world, hence be more expensive. I have seen the news almost every day and leave things like Ferguson to say 'I Will Have him (di maria) "so it has a lot of demand, give us the 18 million who say such bad business was undoubtedly already up because gave us 10 million + nani what should be roughly 20 million.
3 The Marseille dominated Benfica? is your opnion and I respect it but I think you are mistaken, the game was balanced with situations of scoring for each team and a draw seemed fair to me, and still lack the 2nd game (Benfica was not eliminated by Marseille) and imagining that Marseille was better than Benfica as you would like to understand (just because they played better on your second) does not mean they have better players (or the same quality) and cheaper.
4 to 5 million such that the nice entitled to two players atl madrid think k 2.5 were to pass from Reyes and other remains 2.5, but I'm not well informed about it.
Greetings sports
Srª Diogo Santos, as pessoas devem fundamentar os numeros e não dizerem o que querem ou o qe pensam, em baseio-me sempre em numeros e fundamentados, então onde est~
ao aos 100 milhões???? sempre a sonhar ea não ver a realidade, foram precisamente 85,1 milhões e não 100 milhões, uma mentira repetida, não passa a ser verdade. Mais uma coisa, que me lembre o benfica foi mais vezes á liga dos Campoões e nunca mais chegou nem de perto nem de longe a essas receitas de 85,1 milhões, foi só um ano e sem repetição, que me lembre.
Os 20 clubes mais ricos do Mundo
1.º Real Madrid, 292,2 milhões de euros
2.º Barcelona, 259,1
3.º Juventus, 251,2
4.º Manchester United, 242,6
5.º AC Milan, 238,7
6.º Chelsea, 221,0
7.º Inter Milão, 206,6
8.º Bayern Munique, 204,7
9.º Arsenal, 192,4
10.º Liverpool, 176,0
11.º Lyon, 127,7
12.º Roma, 127,0
13.º Newcastle, 124,3
14.º Schalke 04, 122,9
15.º Tottenham, 107,2
16.º Hamburgo, 101,8
17.º Manchester City, 89,4
18.º Glasgow Rangers, 88,5
19.º West Ham, 86,9
20.º Benfica, 85,1
Autor: LUÍS QUARESMA COSTA
Data: Quinta-Feira, 8 Fevereiro de 2007 – 8:38
Relativamente ás notícias que saiem, era como aquela História do beto que ia todos os anos para o real madrid e no ano passado o Bruno Alves que ia para o Barcelona, sabe aonde estão os mesmos não sabe? Nenhum deles foi para o Real Madrid e nem Para o Barcelona, muito menos o Di Maria Vai para o Manchester Unit. O Sobre essa questão o tempo o dirá, tenha calma, mas os jornais não vendem os jogadores, e grande parte do que dizem os jornais desportivos, é só para venderem jornais, sem grande fundamento. E essa do Nani, mais 10 milhões, só mesmo Vª. Exª., para acreditar nessa, porque duvido que exista muitas mais pessoas a acreditar nessa proposta. O benfica Pagou 2,5 milhões e meio pelo Reis, que na minha opinião é bem melhor que o Di Maria, E o Benfica teve que pagar 2.5 milhões por 25% do passe do Reis, e não foi em contrapartida da ida do Simão para o Atletico de Madrid, Pagou. Veja esta informação:
Ora, a “administração Vieira” continua a fazer das suas sobretudo se nos questionarmos relativamente aos 25% do passe de Reyes no qual o Benfica derreteu 2,5 milhões de euros. Pergunto: para que serviu este investimento se agora se dão ao luxo de o deitar fora? Afinal, basta ao Atlético de Madrid vender os seus 50% para que o jogador se transfira para outro clube eo Benfica continue com 2,5 milhões deitados fora.
Agora veja esta informação:
Benfica e Sporting siameses mas muito longe dos portistas
Os outros grandes do futebol nacional apresentaram proveitos operacionais quase iguais, mas abaixo dos registados pelo FC Porto. O Benfica, conforme apresentado no relatório e contas de 2008/09, obteve 46,88 milhões de euros de receitas, cujas maiores fatias foram provenientes da publicidade e patrocínios (11,5 milhões) e das receitas televisivas (10 milhões). No Sporting, os proveitos foram quase os mesmos: 46,82. A parcela relativa à televisão foi idêntica. Os leões arrecadaram, ainda, outros dez milhões pela participação nas provas europeias e outro tanto com as receitas de bilheteira e de lugares anuais. A favor dos encarnados é o valor da quotização: o Benfica recebeu 8,2 milhões eo Sporting 4,4.
Ainda assim, no total, tanto Benfica como Sporting alcançaram menos 19,3 milhões de euros do que o FC Porto.
Já reparou na diferença??? Não vejo onde é que o Benfica faz amis receitas que o Porto, ou muito mais, tirando as receitas da liga dos Campeões, anda ela por ela, mais milhão ou menos milhão, saudações desportivas
I had said 80 million Mr. Kalla said 100 million but was seen by 85 million, n is important, what an interest here for the subject I was trying to make is that in a situation of equality before the Port (both in the Champions) the Benfica (despite the disappointing season) can have much higher income and even the top20 in Europe. If it was once without repetition I think you should provide data (lol) until recently because Benfica n champions have gone to, to see if the year Benfica after going to the Champions (if it is established) can fit figures showing that record not was a passing thing (which for me does not make much sense that statement because in mordern football clubs have a tendency to increase their revenues (at the ticket and television rights)).
I wanted to say here that join the numbers of transfers of players is obvious that Porto is Portugal's Sporting and Benfica in revenue, but the issue here was the Champions revenue, ticketing and broadcasting rights.
About di maria, clearly has not seen the last of him in Benfica game and the selection of Argentina to tell the barbarity that reyes is better than he, and his analogy of "if bruno alves and geek out to the colossi n much less di maria "makes no sense. But as I said and I agree with you time will tell if he moves for a good amount.
About 25% of that Benfica holds the pass of reyes also agree that it was no big deal, but I do not say it was a good deal.
The news of + nani 10 million if it is true or not, just going to the CMVM and seek to confirm, but now I'm short on time, but have a sense of what I think of the subject, I have no doubt that Benfica did very well to reject the proposal (if it happened). See the link below the news of demand for di maria and most of them come from the foreign press, is what it is, but you can see it is one of the players most sought after market ribery for this position.
Greetings Sports
Sr º Diogo Santos, I've been following the Games of Atletico Madrid and come to the Games of Kings, which would have produced much more than the Di Maria and a championship more competitive. Two kings have preferred a Di Maria infomrme is what has made the kings at Atletico and then we talked about that have yielded more. Di Maria scored in our league, three goals in our league for the the future will tell how much will be sold, but will have a big surprise, it was like that History Luisão that would be sold for 25 million euros and was in the market for 12 million and nobody caught on that player's selection of Brazil. Greetings sports.
The history of nani and another 10 million, is only one history and nothing else, has the least foundation, greetings sports.
Sales of players does not come to this report from Deloitte. Greetings sports
the link disappeared but came to see?
once again can not compare with the di maria reyes up because the di maria is 21 and has a future ahead of it, while reyes can even be playing more than the di maria (I disagree) but has not been looking due to his age (note n is an old player). About 25 million Luisão was obvious k with 29 years no one would buy for 12 or whatever quality are completely different situations.
Dear Sirs
I would like to point out some very important things, since I'm connected to the area of sports marketing, I think I know a little of what I speak:
1 - The revenue generated by FC Porto and they should now be superior to Benfica or SCP, since the club has a great brand exposure in the last 10 years, making the case Golden Whistle, which would be unnecessary, and that with withdrew certain value brand, the club was linked to very positive moments in the sports environment, and do not forget that for example when the Fc Porto won the champions had a country to root for him.
These events not only add value at the time to go, but over several seasons.
2 - Fc Porto to make annual purchases and sales of high-quality players, it created a perception of a good administration, which again enhances brand.
3 - As the Fc Porto has managed to make good championships, the average turnover of around merchandasing and tickets must provide increasing numbers every year, frankly I do not have access to these numbers, so I'm just guessing.
4 - It is easier for the club to make a major sponsorship, for example in sweaters since the exhibition was a national and international level, I sincerely believe that a lost opportunity to have sponsored a greater weight, a multinational brand in recent years.
Further,
I've heard, still a little time information for a short-term debt of Benfica in the amount of € 100,000, and a complement to say that the club would deal with this with the sale of two players. Cardozo and Di Maria 60 000 40 000. From what has been said in recent days it seems that this batch left Cardozo, David Luiz, and entered, as I am a man also linked to the financial district had the curiosity to check out some information.
Players Di Maria and David Luiz are part of the batch of players who served as a bargaining chip by the loan earlier this season, as does the Sprting sometimes.
In short even if they are sold by the record levels that actually enter the club will be very little, hence my curiosity to know whence the money to pay this obligation in the short term, with new loans that have already started one day 40 million ... .
As players to avail or not, only after the transfers made is that we know.
Ps: The only club in the world who buys players for a value called "above market" is called Real Madrid, but this is linked to some things that do not describe in this comment.
Peço perdão pela economia nos zeros do texto acima, entendam milhões onde estão milhares de euros.
000.000=000.000.000
Boa Noite,
Estou fazendo uma monografia para um MBA em gestão e marketing esportivo e gostaria de saber o que está englobado nas receitas oriundas de Bilheteria??
São somente a venda de bilhetes ou está incluido o consumo eo comercio nos dias de jogo??
Att
Roberto Pagliotto